Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asexualisation

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete, but redirected to be safe. ugen64 00:56, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Asexualisation

Is this article for real? I think it might be but thought vfd it just in case.

• This article was VfD'd by an anon in November, who created this VfD subpage but forgot to actually put it on VfD. It looks like it's probably a joke, so I'm relisting it. Goplat 16:26, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Dubious orphan. -- Infrogmation 19:32, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a hoax. I would have speedied it, but it's one of those undeletable things. (PS: finding the edit link with those ugly boxes isn't easy.) --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 01:22, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• The term was used in the first half of the 20th century as a synonmyn for what we now call sterilization ("sterilization without asexualization" meant sterilization by means of vasectomy rather than castration). Perhaps a redirect to Sterilization (surgical procedure)? Or just a delete (I somehow doubt many people from 1930 are really going to be searching Wikipedia and wondering why this term doesn't exist). Doesn't matter to me, just thought I'd note it. --Fastfission 06:34, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• I would replace with the proper definition and keep the article --Ojmorales0002 12:29, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.