Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:AICT)
Main pageDiscussionNews &
open tasks
AcademyAssessmentA-Class
review
ContestAwardsMembers

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma#Requested move 28 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 07:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I've got a a question about the rating criteria.

    What does "supporting material" refer to?

    • Supporting materials: criterion not met

    What's missing? Or what needs improvement?

    MWQs (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Tag me in replies please. MWQs (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    "Swarm Drone"[edit]

    Swarm Drone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) claims to be an India-only topic, and only a military topic. Seems, a bit odd, since drone swarms are vastly used in advertising and artistic displays across the world, and espionage and military swarm drones exist outside of India. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 04:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Marine Engineering News[edit]

    The Marine Engineering News was first published in April 1879. Covers mostly UK shipping (including military), with some foreign. Useful for improving articles about ships of that era. I've added the first four volumes to WP:SHIPS/R#Country specific sources. More will be added later. Mjroots (talk) 09:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Found this while patrolling. I can't find references to an "Anglo-Turkish War" using basic google searches, which seems odd given the scale of this article and the large countries involved? I am also wary that this might be a WP:FORK of Turkish War of Independence, which is an article with neutrality issues. Therefore I bring it here for your consideration. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 15:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I would also appreciated any views on whether this should be a standalone article. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Second Northern War#Requested move 23 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Polyamorph (talk) 08:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Multiple new articles on Israeli-Palestinian conflict pushing "martyrdom" POV[edit]

    hey all, I've noticed a bunch of new articles from MWQs that are full of synth and are extreme violations of WP:NPOV.

    This one, that I nominated for deletion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executions and assassinations in the West Bank and Jerusalem, pushes a martyrdom POV and contains Jesus and Eichmann and Jewish and Palestinian terrorists in the same list; it's language is like that: "An eye for an eye", "King of Martyrs", "he refused to commit sin unto the point of shedding blood", "The Martyr Abu Ali Mustafa", "prominent militant".

    Other articles by this user are also problematic: The killing of the wife, daughter, and infant son of Mohammed Deif fails to mention the reason of the attack, and it reads like "IDF just attacked a random house of an innocent Deif". It can be notable, but it should at least be moved to "Deif family massacre" or something similar. It also has the same NPOV problem: "her previous husband was a martyred Qassami fighter", "high-ranking members of so called "terrorist" organisations".

    Executions and assassinations during the Israel–Hamas war, Death of Mahmoud Eshtewi, Extrajudicial killings in the Gaza Strip can have the same problems.

    Any comments from MWQs or military history experts? Artem.G (talk) 18:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" is hardly NPOV. Keith-264 (talk) 18:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    it's right here Israeli–Palestinian conflict, how would you call it? Artem.G (talk) 19:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Something like the Smith regime or Apartheid South Africa. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Keith-264, I'm very confused, what do you mean? MWQs (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Commenting only to mention that @MWQs actually posted on this page several days earlier, asking for advice. Huntthetroll (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Huntthetroll Thanks. MWQs (talk) 05:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Artem.G. You are welcome to add the "reasons for the attack" on "The killing of the wife, daughter, and infant son of Mohammed Deif" if you think it's missing? I thought it already mentioned that it was a failed assassination attempt? What is missing? I would appreciate other contributions to the page. The information about who Deif is is covered extensively elsewhere on wiki, but if you want to summarise it in the background section of that page then that would be very welcome. MWQs (talk) 05:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Artem.G if you prefer "Deif family massacre" it can be that? There is currently an open discussion on the talk page, please contribute. "2014 Deif family massacre" was actually a title I was using for it previously, but I changed it FROM that because I thought that title was too POV and the descriptive title was a more encyclopedic? But if I got that backwards, it can change back. MWQs (talk) 05:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Artem.G regarding Executions and assassinations in the West Bank and Jerusalem I found the history of executions in that region notable enough to start the page because there was such a diversity of events. I think that was highlighted in the intro? The "he refused to commit sin unto the point of shedding blood", is directly taken from another wiki article, I summarised a few others. The "eye for an eye" is a quote from the speech by Ahmad Saadat, I probably did get the tone wrong, but it was just a "working title" for that section, if you can think of a better one, just change it? Wikipedia is designed to be collaborative, if you think something is missing you can add it, and if you think something can be improved, you can improve it. MWQs (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Table formatting[edit]

    Can anyone who knows how to draw up a table point me to a to do page that shows how to make a grid, with small numbers in the top right hand corner of each square? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Keith-264. I don't think I've ever seen that here? Can you find a post that uses that and copy from there? (tag me in reply) MWQs (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @MWQs: Me neither, no, I've looked. I add a note describing the formation of a convoy and the numbering system but it occurred to me that a table would help the reader. I envisage a grid to each margin with the grid number in the top rhs, possibly with the ship name in each square. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Like this?
    table caption
    column 1 column 2
    4

    ship name

    3

    ship name

    Trappist the monk (talk) 14:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks very much Keith-264 (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Does anyone know anything about this organization? The aims and goals are so obviously beneficial to the Soviet Union, I do wonder if there was any direct or indirect ties between them. Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Military dictatorship peer review[edit]

    I've just put Military dictatorship up for a peer review. Given the broad scope of the article, I'm hoping for as many different perspectives as possible. Thanks! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Did the Philippine-American War end in 1902 or 1913?[edit]

    The primary point of contention is whether or not to include the Moro Rebellion (1899-1913) within the article's info box. This placement expresses a view that the Philippine-American War did not in fact end with President Roosevelt's proclamation on July 4, 1902. It asserts the armed conflict, as a matter of fact, ended over a decade later. The single sentence in the article body used to justify the Moro Rebellion's info box inclusion asserts, "Some historians consider these unofficial extensions to be part of the war." The opposing revisions can be found here and here with related discussions here, here and here.

    What I care about primarily is whether or not info box inclusion of the Moro Rebellion, juxtaposed against the canonically recognized July, 4 1902 date, will prevent this article from being assessed GA, A and eventually FA. A decision needs to be made regarding a single date that caps the episode labeled "Philippine-American War", as a matter of fact. Any input and thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Chino-Catane (talk) 01:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    What quality sources state is what really matters. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]