Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Zeppelin/archive1

That's a darn fine article, if you ask me. War zepplin = coolest phrase ever. jengod 03:17, May 20, 2004 (UTC)

Support. Needed only editing for grammar/syntax. Excellent content, well-organized.Denni 07:29, 2004 May 20 (UTC)
Support. Gentgeen 10:31, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, for now. The Wikipedia:Lead section is too long, and the article can't decide whether Zeppelin should be capitalised or not. (I think it should be, it's a person's name). -- Cabalamat 17:27, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrote the introduction and unified the Zeppelin spelling to the capitalised form, except where the word is used in the more general sense for the whole family of rigid airships. Tell me if you disagree with this exception. --J.Rohrer 23:03, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
~~Needs more compare/contrast discussion with zeppelin vs. blimp.~~ Kingturtle 20:07, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Inserted "Principal characteristics" section after the rewritten introduction to clear things up. --J.Rohrer 23:03, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
support. -Pedro 15:42, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the article is lengthy and interesting. --Exigentsky 04:25, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)