Jump to content

Talk:Derek Walcott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 23 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Crmaurik, Nsfrohli, Sydnka, Fegraham. Peer reviewers: NadiaCarneiro1, Mbbahen, HermioneGranger1997, JWSV.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

A clearer reference to 'The Schooner 'Flight (1979) as a well-known work?

80.177.213.144 19:09, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

PLAYS

[edit]

In the first section, reference is made to an essay Walcott supposedly wrote in 1940. According to the birthdate above, this would make Walcott 10 years old when the essay was published. Something is wrong here, but I don't know what. WikiFanCMC 14:04, 18 April 2008 (CET)

I am interested in Walcott's plays. Can anyone help me find out which ones are the best out of the 40 odd he's written? ThePeg 16:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would certainly read his Haitian Trilogy, Ti-Jean, and Pantomime.

There is no discussion of the fact that he has been accused of sexual harrasment twice while being on the faculty of BU. This is well documented. BU also settled a sexual harrasment lawsuit for an undisclosed sum. Why is this not in his biography?

walcott is a inspiring man who has inspierd alot of people including me a 14 years old girl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.50.69.3 (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not much biography, is there?

[edit]

The only biographical information about the man, apart from his works, is his name and the date and place of his birth.

The information on his father is semi-inaccurate. The article states he died before Derek and Roderick were born, but they were both 15 months old before he died. The source that is listed in the article says nothing on the father dying before their birth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.13.43.19 (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to find out why the article on Trinidad and Tobago claims him as a Trinidadian. There is nothing in this article to shed light on this. Respectfully, SamBlob (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is not Trinidadian, though he has lived there before. He is Saint Lucian, as evidenced in his autobiographical poems Another Life, Omeros, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.121.86.216 (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there should really be more biography here. Where did he go to school? How did he first come to prominence? What countries did he live in, and when? What about his family or upbringing?161.149.63.183 (talk) 00:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ask DW about Omeros

[edit]

Your chance to improve the article! On Wednesday 10th September 2008 at BBC Bush House at 16.00hrs, Derek Walcott will be talking about his epic poem Omeros on the BBC's World Book Club. If you would like to put a question to Derek Walcott about Omeros, email worldbookclub@bbc.co.uk. If you're in the UK, you can be part of the audience. After transmission the programme will be permanently available to "listen again" on the BBC website. EdQuine (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did he really die. Nothing like this on bbc... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.129.15.181 (talk) 16:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clyde and Theo

[edit]

Is he related to them? 81.159.70.120 (talk)81.159.70.120 (talk) 07:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 07:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Ausseagull (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Smear campaign"

[edit]

I amended the material on the recent anonymous distribution of details about the allegations of abuse so that it no longer has WP calling it a "smear campaign" - which really is not an NPOV term - but makes it clear that the sources referred to used the term. Kay Dekker (talk) 23:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

more on this

[edit]

This was added to the article on Padel: <blockquote>Padel's comportment in the affair was roundly criticized by a number of respected poets in a letter of support addressed to Walcott and published in the [[Times Literary Supplement]]<ref>[[Al Alvarez]], [[Alan Brownjohn]], [[Carmen Bugan]], [[David Constantine]], [[Elizabeth Cook]], [[Robert Conquest]], [[Jonty Driver]], [[Seamus Heaney]], [[Jenny Joseph]], [[Patrick Kavanagh]], [[Grevel Lindop]], [[Patrick McGuiness]], [[Lucy Newlyn]], [[Bernard O’Donoghue]], [[Michael Schmidt]], [[Jon Stallworthy]], [[Michael Suarez]], [[Don Thomas]], [[Anthony Thwaite]], 'Oxford Professor of Poetry', [[Times Literary Supplement]], June 3 2009, p. 6.</ref></blockquote> I removed it from there as it does not mention Padel at all in the source - TLS Letters to the Editor 3rd June 2009 - modified, it might be for inclusion here if we accept letters to the TLS from prominents (I don't see why not, but maybe I'm unaware of a policy/guideline that says otherwise) But at the moment I see no logical place for it in the article except in the lead, which didn't garv me.--163.1.147.64 (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TS Eliot Prize Winner

[edit]

the announcement is here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jan/24/ts-eliot-prize-derek-walcott if anyone is concerned ixo (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Derek Walcott.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Derek Walcott.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Derek Walcott.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies: Undue Weight

[edit]

This section is almost longer than that devoted to Walcott's entire career, which seems to be WP:Undue Weight. It should be summarized, as much of the controversy was more of a self-referential media storm, prompted by the topic of sexual harassment and the role played by a woman poet in challenging a man. While the story is interesting, coverage in this article is out of proportion to the artistic work and accomplishments of Walcott's career. It seems a good example to use for "media storms" related to culture and gender wars, as several journalists commented on that aspect of it. Is there such a topic? Parkwells (talk) 19:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Most of it was added by a strong POV editor last year and then tempered down, but there's still too much of it. Span (talk) 21:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article's Organization

[edit]

I think this article could use an overhaul, particularly with regard to the way Walcott's career is documented. Does anyone think the article could be better organized? Also, I would like to add more organized literary criticism of his work (as well as snippets from book reviews, both positive and negative). Any thoughts?Jpcohen (talk) 04:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a half decent article (re major events and ref'ing), but yes, it could use a close working over. Span (talk) 00:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10th reference is a dead end, need someone who knows how to fix it.

[edit]

Title says it all.JoshBM16 (talk) 12:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Derek Walcott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selected tributes and obituaries

[edit]

I have removed the list below from the main article, as it appeared unduly promotional, and did not add content. As external links, their contents probably don't add much beyond what would be present in a FA-class article. I am placing them here for use as selective rerources for content, not a laundry list of accolades.