Talk:List of family trees
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Is there a way to create a tree without making it an image? --rs2 17:58, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- You could write it in wikicode, but it'd be very ugly and tedious. You could draw it in Microsoft Word and save it as a Word Document, but it's look rather ugly. I know this is a very, very belated answer to your question... ugen64 02:43, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
There's a category "family trees" as well as a "list of family trees." Are both needed? Also, the apple family tree could probably be merged into the "apple" article, in my opinion. --Doctorcherokee 01:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Of course both are necessary. Categories and lists are the soma of this brave new world. muriel@pt 17:39, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
What is wrong with the family trees? A lot of them are gone and the image title still there. Did someone change them?