Jump to content

Talk:Abraham Lincoln

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleAbraham Lincoln is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleAbraham Lincoln has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 5, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 16, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
October 8, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
December 24, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
February 22, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
September 23, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
September 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 16, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 1, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 9, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 4, 2004, April 14, 2004, April 14, 2005, and February 12, 2009.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024[edit]

Add pages=35-36 to reference 78 (The Collected Works Volume 1 reference), since that's where the quote is in [[1]] (pages 84 and 85 in PDF).

Sorry, didn't realize Collected and Completed works were different. Please add page 109 to the citation[[2]].

GrapesRock (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: @GrapesRock, which citation? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 08:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reference 78, which is the first citation after "It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher" GrapesRock (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Now that I have auto-confirmed perms, I've edited in the page number GrapesRock (talk) 03:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024 (2)[edit]

Change Reference 187 to go to Volume 6[[3]] rather than Volume 4 of Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. The First Inaugural Address is on page 169–170 (pages 221 and 222 of PDF) of Volume 6 and is not found in Volume 4.

Er sorry, Collected and Complete Works are different. In that case, add that the page is 333 per [1] to reference 187, which comes after the block-quote from his "First inaugural address, 4 March 1861" GrapesRock (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Now that I have autoconfirmed permissions, I've enacted this change GrapesRock (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2024[edit]

The Lincoln Memorial is no longer in top 5 visited, rather it is in the top 10, so note that.

More explicitly, please change "and is one of the top five most visited National Park Service sites in the country." to "and is one of the top ten most visited National Park Service sites in the country.[2]" GrapesRock (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just changed it to "one of the most visited" as it does not need it to be jumping around each year, and the exact number is not crucial, here. Alanscottwalker (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandburg 1926 seems miscited on two occasions[edit]

I've been going through the citations which reference Sandburg 1926 [3] and the page numbers seem wrong. I've already corrected the page numbers on two occasions, but I can't find proper page numbers for the following two references:

  • "Thomas Lincoln bought or leased farms in Kentucky before losing all but 200 acres (81 ha) of his land in court disputes over property titles."
    • cites Sandburg p. 20 (as of writing: citation 11), which says nothing about losing all but 200 acres (and I can't find support for this claim anywhere in Sandburg)
  • "In 1860, Lincoln noted that the family's move to Indiana was "partly on account of slavery", but mainly due to land title difficulties."
    • cites Sandburg 1926, p. 20 and Donald 1996, pp. 23–24 (as of writing: citation 18). I can't speak on whether Donald supports this claim, but once again nothing on page 20 in Sandburg supports the claim

GrapesRock (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have the DHD book on loan from my library and can verify that second ref.
On pages 23-24, it says "In 1816, when Abraham was only seven years old, the Lincolns moved across the Ohio river to Indiana. Many years later he stated, quite accurately, that his father left Kentucky "partly on account of slavery, but chiefly on account of the difficulty in land titles in Ky."
DHD doesn't tell the reader that Lincoln said this in 1860, but in the footnotes he does source the statement to p. 61-62 in vol 4 of Lincoln's Collected Works ed. Roy P. Basler, which covers Abraham's 1860 autobiographical statement. In it Abraham says that "From this place he removed to what is now Spencer county Indiana, in the autumn of 1816, A. then being in his eigth year. This removal was partly on account of slavery; but chiefly on account of the difficulty in land titles in Ky." (Yes, that's Abraham writing in the third person. Go figure.) https://books.google.com/books?id=LQjla5mLYdcC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false So yeah, "In 1860, Lincoln noted that the family's move to Indiana was "partly on account of slavery", but mainly due to land title difficulties" is an accurate statement with a suitable source.
The first statement, "Thomas Lincoln bought or leased farms in Kentucky before losing all but 200 acres (81 ha) of his land in court disputes over property titles," is more difficult to verify.
In pages 22, DHD gives an account of Thomas Lincoln's property holdings thus: "Thomas... accumulate[d] enough money to buy his first farm, a 238-acre tract on Mill Creek, in Hardin County, Kentucky... By 1809, Thomas Lincoln had bought another farm, this time one of 300 acres, on the south fork of Nolan Creek (not far from Hogdenville). It was called the Sinking Spring Farm, because it had a magnificent spring that bubbled from the batter of a deep cave. Here, on a little knoll near the spring, he built a one-room log cabin, measuring 16-by-18 feet. Here Abraham Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809. He had no recollection of the place of his birth, because his parents moved before he was 2 years old. The land on Sinking Spring proved very poor, ... [so Thomas bought] a smaller but more fertile farm, some ten miles to the northeast, on Knob Creek... It was of this Knob Creek farm that Abraham Lincoln had his earliest memories."
So here we have 3 properties: a "238-acre tract on Mill Creek", a Sinking Spring farm of 300 acres, and a Knob Creek farm of unspecified acrage.
DHD then says on page 24 what happened to these properties: "He [Thomas] had trouble gaining a clear title to any of the 3 farms that had purchased in Kentucky. The details were exceedingly complicated, and not particularly important: one had been improperly surveyed, so that it proved to be 38 acres smaller than what he had thought he had purchased; another had a lien on it because of a small debt by a previous owner; in the case of the Knob Creek Farm, non-Kentucky residents brought suit against Thomas and other occupants of the rich valley, claiming prior title. Having neither the money nor the inclination to fight for his claims in court, he heard with great interest of the opening of Indiana, territory from which slavery had been excluded by the Northwest Ordinance. Here the United States government had surveyed the land and offered purchasers guaranteed titles to their farms. [And so Thomas went to Indiana.]"
That's maddeningly vague. From just this paragraph, which constitutes the entirety of DHD's account of Thomas' property losses, it's ambiguous whether Thomas "had a lien on" his Sinking Spring property and lost 38 acres from Mill Creek, or the other way around; which would mean that he might have been left with only 200 acres (if Sinking Spring had the lien and Mill Creek the 38 acres), or 300 acres (if Mill Creek had the lien and Sinking Spring the 38 acres). I make those calculations assuming that Thomas lost his Knob Creek property, which I think is implied by him getting sued and not fighting in court, but I'm not very educated on legal matters so idk. I'm also assuming Thomas lost whatever property he had a lien on, based on my understanding of what a lien is after Googling the term. In the footnotes, DHD's only source for Thomas' property holdings is Lincoln's Parentage and Childhood by Louis A Warren; "My account of Thomas Lincoln and his property holding derives principally from Warren," says DHD. Luckily, Lincoln's Parentage is stored in full for free at Google Books (I love the Internet!) https://books.google.com/books/about/Lincoln_s_Parentage_Childhood.html?id=iRlCAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false; however it's 300ish pages and I can't be bothered to search the whole thing for details that are supposedly "exceedingly complicated."
Thus, I could not verify that "Thomas Lincoln bought or leased farms in Kentucky before losing all but 200 acres (81 ha) of his land in court disputes over property titles," based on DHD's book. I don't think it's necessary to say exactly how many acres Thomas had left anyway; we can just say something like "Thomas Lincoln bought or leased multiple farms in Kentucky, but could not gain clear titles to all of them and lost hundreds of acres of land in property disputes."
Side note here, but Lincoln by DHD was published in 1995, not 1996. Idk exactly when that error in dates was added, but glancing at the page history I can see that as early as March 2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abraham_Lincoln&oldid=947624055# this page had that error. That ought to be fixed.
TL:DR: Donald 1995 p. 23-24 is a perfect reference for ""In 1860, Lincoln noted that the family's move to Indiana was "partly on account of slavery", but mainly due to land title difficulties." I could not verify that "Thomas Lincoln bought or leased farms in Kentucky before losing all but 200 acres (81 ha) of his land in court disputes over property titles," and I recommend that we simply edit out the exact number. I hope this comment helped, and let me know if you need to verify anything else that's cited to DHD or might be in there somewhere. Woozybydefault (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for checking those citations! I've tried to implement them here, if I messed something up, feel free to give a holler here, or go forth and change it yourself :-). I kept Donald as 1996 for now, since the linked Google Book says the date was 1996 (though it also says it was originally published in 1995). I'm not sure whether the linked book is a different version or whatever is up with it. GrapesRock (talk) 23:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most Oates citations fail verification[edit]

The brief of this is that most of the Oates 1974 references seem like they're not supported by the book listed in the Bibliography and what my preliminary explorations were into what the proper citations might be.

I was able to find a (probably) different version of Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct available in the Internet Archive, with the Lincoln section between pages 97 and 107. Further, I found that the scope of the text was limited to just actions taken while president based on p. xxviii.

Most of the citations don't seem supported like they could ever be supported in text by this Oates book, since they are things that happened before Lincoln became President. The only one that seemed related was citation 207 Oates 1974, p. 115. which is largely supported by pages 99–101 of the archive copy, though I don't see anything about a telegraph.

I kinda wonder whether these citations are from some other Stephen B. Oates book and just cited as Oates 1974 instead? I did notice in this diff that both {{sfn|Oates|1974|p=226}}, {{sfn|Oates|1974|pp=15–17}} were introduced, replacing ref names that referred to Oates1994, but the other Oates sfns that were introduced in this change were originally named either Oates1974 or "Oates1974", so I don't know what their deal is.

<ref name=Oates1994>{{Cite book|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=Dqti86cewuYC}}|title=With Malice Toward None: The Life of Abraham Lincoln|last=Oates|first=Stephen B.|date=June 30, 2009|publisher=Harper Collins|isbn=9780061952241}}</ref> is what those two citations used to refer to, but I don't know whether this is the right version of the book, nor how to cite it (it's odd that it was referred to as Oates1994 even though the google book is from 2009 and it was originally published in 1977). I do know that it's available on the archive though it has a different ISBN.

Anyways, that leaves 5 Oates citations that I can't explain, namely 83, 89, 119, 130, and 152 as of this revision. GrapesRock (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln8/1:711.1?rgn=div2;view=fulltext;q1=fondly+do+we+hope
  2. ^ Brown, Forrest (23 February 2024). "The most visited National Park Service sites 2023". CNN.com. Retrieved 2 June 2024.
  3. ^ https://www.google.com/books/edition/Abraham_Lincoln_the_Prairie_Years/deFCAAAAIAAJ?hl=en