Jump to content

Talk:List of Southwest Airlines destinations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Format

[edit]

Might be nice to convert this list to the same format used by most other US based airlines. See America West Airlines destinations or United Airlines destinations for examples. Vegaswikian 00:00, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Codeshare with ATA

[edit]

i deleted alot from this section. southwest doesnt have service to phx or mdw operated by ATA...thats the codeshare. Southwest flys the passengers to those cities, where they continue on their merry way on ATA. therefor; phx, mdw, oak are already listed on this list. also, i deleted the mexico, because southwest doesnt codeshare internationally as of now (while it is planned as part of the codeshare agreement) ((i work in reservations for swa..))

Chart

[edit]

I added the chart with publicly available information...the number of gates that southwest has at an airport and what year they were started isnt secret, the non stop destinations can easily be found on the route map on Southwest.com

Focus City

[edit]

No where in the article does it define what is a "focus city". The article should probably contain such a definition. Victor Victoria (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Delta Air Lines destinations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is LAX slated to become an operating base for WN?

[edit]

The cited source does not support this claim, so I'm removing it for now. Airbornemihir (talk) 06:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Hole edit war

[edit]

Recent additions by anonymous user 157.131.123.208 lack citations meeting WP:RS to back up the repeated addition of Jackson Hole, Wyoming to the list of destinations. My attempts to verify this information have been fruitless. The latest addition of this information appears to violate the three-revert rule. 157.131.123.208, the onus is on you to provide appropriate citations to back up your edits. Carguychris (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]