Jump to content

Talk:Declaration of Indulgence (1687)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

I don't know how to do a redirect, but someone should do so - there is a somewhat more detailed article at Royal Declaration of Indulgence. Sturgeonslawyer (13 April 05 1.12 PDST)

They are not the same thing. One was issued in 1672, the other in 1688. --Valentinian 17:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

why is the full text not reproduced here? presumably it is in the public domain. 70.187.18.116 20:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

James II not Charles II in opening para. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.6.82 (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

The description of the Covenanters as "extremist" is biased and has no place in an encyclopedia. I propose that it be removed Acorn897 (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Declaration of Indulgence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]