Jump to content

Talk:Wassily Leontief

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1

[edit]

User:Optim, I'm sure you're watching this page, so I'll reply to your comment on my talk page here! It was nice to have an appreciative comment, so thanks! Anyway, another possible improvement to the formatting of this article is re-arranging the external links -- there are a lot of them, and they're useful, but I think they seem a bit cluttered in the text. How about moving them to the relevant wikipedia articles or simply entering them as [1]? --Sam

Yes you are right, I will take care. Thanks for the recommendation! Optim 00:08, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)


What you say about the "small lie" is true, but probably irrelevant. In practice, the "Nobel" prizes in Economics are awarded through a peer-review system much like the one used for "true" Nobel prizes. So, in my view, all the fuss about its pedigree is a bit of attempted upmanship by the members of "harder" sciences – which indeed may well be justified, but on other grounds. Mario 11:17, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Birth certificate

[edit]

I'd like to include a photo of his birth certificate, as it is relevant and people still change the birth date (he thought most of his life that he was born in 1906 in Russia, but the certificate, when it was found, showed otherwise). However, I'm not sure - as an official document from Germany from 1905, is it public domain? AdamSmithee 08:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC) I am chancing it back to 1905.[reply]

The actual 1905 birth certificate would probably be public domain in the U.S. (and possibly in Germany, if it's considered an anonymous work), but the image you point to is not that. It appears to be a recent document (dated 2005), with a transcription of information from the original certificate. As such, the question is whether recent German government forms are copyrighted; I don't have a definitive answer myself, but it's likely to be yes. You could still cite it externally, though. --Davepape 14:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As stated by Davepape, this is not an actual image of the birth certificate. The footnote has been modified to reflect this fact. Also, Leontief did not say he was born in St. Petersburg, only that he grew up there. (The footnote incorrectly described the Nobel Prize bio has saying he was born in St. P.) So, with the Nobel Prize bio saying 1906 and VIAF data saying 1906 we have two sources for the 1906 YOB. Verses the one (dated 2005) which gives a 1905 YOB. The article data has been changed to 1906 in all respects. – S. Rich (talk) 22:37, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Leontief-Harvard.jpg

[edit]

Image:Leontief-Harvard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solved. I hope that is enough AdamSmithee 07:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On Russian-Jewish attribution

[edit]

Hi! I remember, Leontief was first marked as a Jew here by one totally crazy person who was later banned from Wikipedia for using sockpuppet accounts. I reverted that edit, but then it reappeared.

Wassily Leontief, and the article clearly states that, is of mixed ethnical origin. So, lets skip that part. Geopolitical attribution is enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gritzko (talkcontribs) 20:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exit from the USSR

[edit]

Ahem, could the sarcoma diagnosis be bought to leave the country? 212.188.108.80 (talk) 01:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wassily Leontief. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wassily Leontief. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth 1905 or 1906?

[edit]

The article presents conflicting information on the year of birth. see opening sentence and the infobox (including tag death_date).
Other wikis (ru, de, nl) are also confused. Which is it? Mill 1 (talk) 19:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]