Jump to content

Talk:Arthurs Seat, Victoria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm rather dissattisfied with this article as it stands. The only link to it is from the disambiguation page Arthur's Seat. Is there a category for Suburbs of Victoria? Having never been there, I don't know if this is a significant area or non-notable. Advice from an Australian apprieciated. Anyhow, I have added a stub message and listed on pages needing attention. At the very least making links to surrounding areas instead of just directions would be a good idea. SkArcher 20:41, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

aboriginal heritage

[edit]

After noting the subject matter of the sculptures at Sea Winds I'm quite lost as to weather or not there is any significance or history between indigenous Australians and Arthurs Seat as I cannot find any information on the matter. Could anyone please send me links (if any) to references that cite this area to be culturally significant. Mjw1990 (talk) 06:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sub sections

[edit]

As part of expanding the information on the page I have started to create sub headings. while these do not contain much information presently, they have been created to assist a more organized and structured page build. Mjw1990 (talk) 04:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Involved Groups

[edit]

I Understand there are users involved in the dispute currently involving the chairlift development who are involved in editing this page. Could i please encourage you create a page for your group "Save Arthurs Seat" and then link to here. This is a suggestion to avoid any more disruptive edits that involve mass removal of relevant references. Mjw1990 (talk) 12:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding to surrounding suburbs

[edit]

Have been tying to create a more honest representation of the page. This has had much to establish what history is actually applicable to this page and not getting confused with McCrae or Dromana. Would suggest we attempt to work on the surrounding areas that can be linked through here. Mjw1990 (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthurs vs Arthur's

[edit]

I propose that this page be moved to "Arthurs Seat, Victoria" (without the apostrophe)

"An apostrophe should be deleted from place names written with a final `s’, or the possessive `s’ should not be included in the first instance. For example, Wilsons Promontory (not Wilson’s Promontory)."

-Ref: Geographic Place Names Act 1998 (Victoria) --Melburnian 07:27, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Split

[edit]

At the moment the article seems to be about the town, the state park, and the hill. Perhaps we could move all the geological info, the chairlift dramas etc to Arthurs Seat State Park.

I disagree - the suburb article is not substantial enough to require splitting - that is why we have headings. Id note too that the redirect to which the above links was only created today. Orderinchaos 10:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Er, yes, I created it :) I agree there's not a huge amount of text, but having three distinct topics in one is a bit messy. It's awkward with categories having a single article be in a "state parks" category and in a "towns" category for instance - clearly a state park is not a town, and vice versa. But anyway it's not a pressing issue. Stevage 02:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The area is a popular local tourist site and deserves wiki coverage. Probably needs some more reference to the extensive gardens and walking trails. Against splitting. Titus Vespasian (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus for split. SilkTork *YES! 00:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arthurs Seat, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Arthurs Seat, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Arthurs Seat, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]