Talk:Sticklepath
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Valid topic but right now it's a copyvio. Please re-write or else it'll get the copyvio tag. --Woohookitty 00:02, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Where has it been copied from? Biscuittin (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- The original version of this article was a cut'n'paste job from http://south-zeal.com/bv/page063.html, which appears to claim (c) 2004. Even the sourcing to two books/leaflets was copied verbatim. Although it's possible that our IP editor was the same person who wrote the south-zeal.com pages, we couldn't be sure of this now even if he reappears (it was a dynamic IP address), so I've reduced this to a stub, pending a rewrite. The other 13 Jan 2005 contribs from 82.153.65.137 were presumably also copyvios - to be investigated. —SMALLJIM 17:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The Courtenay family
[edit]I think this section may be incorrect. Hugh de Courtenay was not born until 1248 so how could he have married in 1242? Biscuittin (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Sticklepath page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Sticklepath" page.