Template talk:Infobox video game
 | Template:Infobox video game is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infobox video game template. |
|
_-_The_Noun_Project.svg){kind=small}
| ||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Age ratings need to be implemented![edit]
Age ratings needs to be a part of the standard template for video games. I think this should be obvious. (Can someone fix? I don't know how) 2A01:563:128:700:DCA4:4385:D7F4:3F67 (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Could you provide any arguments that transcend the previous discussion on the matter? IceWelder [✉] 19:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- There are too many age rating systems in the world to be able to include them all in infoboxes. Hence why we (as well as for movies and television shows) do not implement them. Masem (t) 19:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Late response, but I was thinking maybe we could draw from Wikidata and have it automatically populated in a small module in the release section like the review scores? But it definitively isn't infobox worthy. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 23:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
License field[edit]
I have looked through some of the links in the header here about adding new parameters, and see that there seems like pretty solid agreement that some stuff (i.e. repository link, release version etc) shouldn't be included. But I do not see any real in-depth discussion of licensing; there is stuff like Template_talk:Infobox_video_game/Archive_15#Add_license_field? and Template_talk:Infobox_video_game/Archive_15#missing_fields where somebody just says "this field previously existed and was removed by consensus", but doesn't link to the consensus; either way these discussions were five and seven years ago respectively. Somebody proposes making a separate infobox for open source games and then including the fields in there, which I don't really see having much response.
I do see the argument against putting in a param for license, which is that it wouldn't be used very often, which is true, although I don't really see why it would be a big deal (almost every infobox on the project has multiple unused parameters). What is the story on this? jp×g🗯️ 23:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- The main reason it's not in the infobox is it's a little beyond "wouldn't be used very often" and much closer to "less than 1% would use". It's presence would also result in tons of people adding things like "license = Proprietary" over and over all over the place, because a omitted parameter is a parameter to be filled in many people's minds. -- ferret (talk) 23:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- The less parameters in use, the better. Any game that isn't proprietary usually has that mentioned in prose and included as a category. An infobox that has several unused parameters should be looked at and fixed too. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 23:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)