Jump to content

Talk:We the Curious

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

==Comment==

I have moved this from @Bristol, as this is the official way of writing it. The logo may make it appear to be spelled with an @, and it is commonly spelled like that, but the symbol in the logo is the whole word "at", surrounded with a circle in the style of @. The web site consistently writes it as "At-Bristol". Damn stupid name, either way. --Ascorbic 09:59, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

don't know if it's relevant but @bristol has been at the centre of a lot of controversy down the years, mainly because of it's sponsorship by Nestle and it's links to the Merchant Venturers. In addition I seem to recall that the original founder of the Exploratory whose name escapes me was not happy with the way his ideas were implemented.

Article Re-write

[edit]

This article was a bit short, and had very little info in it. I've bumped up the content and, more importantly IMO, created sections for each attraction, which I hope will encourage others to contribute things they know about each. I've also created a couple of obvious redirects, 'At Bristol', and 'Wildwalk'. I'll be adding a few pictures soon. Any comments? TheIslander 15:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]

This should probably be mentioned somewhere: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pounds-97m-spent-on-silly-revamp-of-museum-1118365.html SmartSE (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Training session

[edit]

A Wikimedia Training session was held here March 5, 2012. See: WMUK:At-Bristol_WorkshopLeutha (talk) 22:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on At-Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on At-Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]