User talk:Joakim Ziegler
I'm Joakim Ziegler, a Norwegian wiki editor living in Mexico City.
Dario Argento
[edit]I made some big changes to the article, check it out!
Hello Joakim Ziegler this message is a invitation to categorize your userpage in the category: Category:Wikipedians of Mexico or in the adecuate sub-category and erasing your name from the equivalent list since the lists of users are in process of being transformed into categories. Remember: You can categorize your user page in more than one category. example: your actual location and your origin country.
for more info see: Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location
Saludos. --Mnts 03:11, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
ZeroC has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this company might not be notable enough for an article. Please review WP:CORP for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 03:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Internet Communications Engine has also been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 03:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the company is notable even with the inclusion of Michi Henning. Were this a movie, for example, the inclusion of one "star" amongst other unnotables would be called stunt casting; I believe this to be much the same. While ICE may meet software notability (and nothing wrong with that), there's no indicator that its parent company does, and I'd have to see more on the article to be convinced otherwise. That being said, I'm rather easy to convince in this regard, and if it doesn't look like microadvertising (which it seems to), that's my main concern.--み使い Mitsukai 17:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Didn't think that you were involved with them, and there's no rule saying you can't mention it even if you are, so that's not an issue. My concern was more that it was a relatively recent article and that it "felt" like advertising, so I took what I thought were the appropriate steps. If you wish to leave them, that's fine, but if I'm thinking that it feels like advertising, so might others, so some expanding of the article might be in order to prevent this. Hope this helps.--み使い Mitsukai 19:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Universidades y Colegios
[edit]I would like to invite you to check out the userboxes that I have created in Wikipedia! If your Collge/University is not there feel free to make create one or let me known and I'll make it (User: Lufthmark)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Education/Mexico
Vandalism?
[edit]Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Néstor Kirchner. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- You restored a vandalic comment: [1]. It looked like you were the same as 200.43.164.192 (talk · contribs) or 200.43.164.196 (talk · contribs). If that's not the case, please accept my apologies. Just to make it clear, Kirchner's nickname is not "Virolita". :) —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 21:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Sources required
[edit]As a self-professed Wikipedian from Mexico, please help to find sources for Fresa (AfD discussion) in order to make a verifiable encyclopaedia article about the concept. See chav for how such articles should be sourced. Uncle G 11:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the article covering LTTE
[edit]Hi, just wanted to draw your attention to the current status of the article regarding the LTTE. I am trying to keep POV tags on it as it contains several statements that I consider poorly documented (LTTE involved in drug smuggling, forced prostitution and cooperation with Al Quaida). To make my position clear (as I also have done on the article's talk page) I am no friend of the LTTE - I consider their organisation in several ways have fascists and anti-democratic sides that I am strongly against. However I do believe that Wikipedia should be based on facts, not "talk on the town". I dont want to waste too much time over that article, but at least I will try to keep the POV tags from what I consider biased edits from sinhala chauvinists. If you could have a look and engage (or critizise me if I am wrong) I would be happy about that. Ulflarsen 08:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Your user page
[edit]I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 13:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Happy WikiBirthday (a few days late)
[edit]This is a bit late, but I just noticed that you first started editing 8 years ago on the 14th. Happy WikiBirthday—you must be the most senior editor I've had the honor of meeting yet! rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 00:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Joakim Ziegler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 387 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Álvaro Delgado - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Are you certain that this proposed deletion, without debate, will be clearly non-controversial? Bearian (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm open to the idea that it's not, but it's an orphan article with basically no references, about an author who has only self-published and is not really mentioned anywhere outside of her own website and a couple of websites that charge for coverage, so I'm pretty sure it's non-notable. Feel free to remove to notice and we'll have a debate if you think it's worthwhile, though.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Joakim Ziegler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Joakim Ziegler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Joakim Ziegler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bill Hicks
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bill Hicks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CopernicusAD (u) (t) :) 19:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Joakim Ziegler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
[edit]
Dear Joakim Ziegler,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |