Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonization of Europa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 02:13, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
Not encyclopedic. According to official policy, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball (Wikipedia: What Wikipedia is not). "Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are original research and therefore inappropriate." Unless someone can provide a valid reason why this article merits inclusion, I think it should be deleted.--DannyZ
- Delete. Agree. -- Fingers-of-Pyrex 03:16, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
- Delete. Future history--Heathcliff 03:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete speculation. Gazpacho 03:41, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unencyclopedic speculation. JeremyA 04:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Colonization of the outer solar system already covers this subject. No need to merge because there is no content on it yet. —Tokek 05:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not encyclopaedic- if there was an actual plan for something like this (like NASA's plan to go to Mars eventually) then it would be worthwhile, but it isn't so it goes --Cynical 13:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Tokek. — RJH 16:33, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteI completely agree with Tokek, user Drepanopulos, 17 May 2005
- Redirect to something like Future colonization of space and expand, with discussion of the problems involved and potential solutions. RickK 22:54, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - " is something that might happen " ??? Yopohari 08:49, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no content to merge. I don't think a redirect is needed, but if one is created, it should point to the correct parent cited by Tokek. Barno 14:01, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: In a few decades (would have been sooner if Nixon hadn't cut funding), we might conceivably need to split an article with a title such as RickK suggested (with most of the current content) from (Actual) Colonization of the outer solar system. In practice, I suspect the closest we'll come to "colonization" for centuries is the equivalent of workers on offshore oil-drilling rigs. I'm a science fiction fan, and realize that Interstellar colonization is a quite different and longer-term matter than Colonization of the outer solar system, so they probably shouldn't be combined into one "... of space" page. Barno 00:44, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.